×
SEARCH
Mohsen Saraji Creative Director and Thematic Designer
Amusement parks usually start with the image of excitement;
speed, light, sound, crowds, games and moments that are supposed to be separated from everyday life.
But behind this energetic image, there is a less seen reality:
that many amusement parks fail not at the design stage, but at the operation stage.
At first glance, one might think that the problem is the equipment, investment or even the location.
But in many projects, the main problem lies elsewhere;
somewhere between the “design” and the “real life of the space”
An amusement park is not just a collection of devices and structures.
Rather, it is a living system of human experience that must be constantly managed, regulated and recreated.
This is exactly where the role of the “operator” becomes important.
In many projects, design is seen as a separate phase and is effectively separated from the process after the opening.
But in entertainment spaces, the opening is not the end;
it is the real beginning.
The designer creates the world of the space;
but the operator is the one who keeps that world alive.
When these two roles are separated, the result is often a space with “high potential but low experience.”
A space that is attractive on paper but gradually declines in practice.
In the absence of professional operation, several things often happen:
The rhythm of the experience is lost, the paths of movement become worn out, the initial appeal diminishes, and the space gradually turns from a living experience into a static complex.
Amusement parks inherently require experience management, not just physical management.
This means constantly asking:
What exactly is the audience experiencing in this space today?
If the answer to this question is not updated, even the best designs will lose their effectiveness over time.
In many successful global examples, the operator is not simply an executive;
but is part of the experience design team.
He analyzes audience behavior, identifies weaknesses in the experience, and even plays a role in improving the narrative of the space.
This is why some amusement parks remain alive, attractive, and popular after years;
not just because of the original design, but because of the ongoing management of the experience.
In contrast, spaces that do not have this cycle usually experience a gradual decline;
a decline that is not sudden, but quiet and invisible.
The audience gradually returns less, the initial excitement subsides, and the space becomes a repetitive experience.
In entertainment spaces, design without exploitation is perhaps like writing a story without being read;
a text that exists but does not live.
Ultimately, a successful amusement park is not just the result of good design,
but the result of a continuous relationship between design, implementation, and exploitation;
a relationship that, if severed, even the best ideas become an unfinished experience.